Skip to content
arghiv

Terminal Discourse Classification

Submissions may carry one or more TDC codes, shown on the abstract page in the TDC classes row. Classification is supplied by the author and is not checked.

The scheme was drafted in a single sitting and has been revised twice, both times to add a class rather than to remove one.

The archive keeps one other scheme of its own: the response-type manual, which names the ways a direct question is answered, or is not.

1Corpora and collection

1.01
Corpora collected with consent
1.02
Corpora collected otherwise
1.07
Corpora whose collection is the finding

2Instruments

2.03
Schedules and coding manuals
2.08
Instruments withdrawn from an instrument

3Termination

3.04
Termination, observed
3.14
Termination, apparent
3.22
Termination reached and not noticed

4Non-termination

4.02
Disputes admitting no terminal state
4.11
Disputes in which the terminal state is contested
4.19
Interventions of no effect

5Participant report

5.06
Participant self-report
5.11
Participant self-report, mutually incompatible

6Rhetorical form

6.07
Restatement, louder
6.13
Concession, provisional and later denied

7Automated counsel

7.03
Counsel sought after the position was fixed
7.09
Counsel obtained from two instruments in disagreement

8Authority

8.05
Authority cited in place of evidence
8.12
Authority cited against itself

9Self-reference

9.01
Work whose classification forms part of its subject
9.04
Work cited by its own authors as independent support

0Unclassifiable

0.01
Unclassifiable
0.02
Classified 0.01 in error

Notes

Division 0 is reserved for work that cannot be placed. It contains two classes, which is one more than the Institute intended and one fewer than has been proposed.

Authors who dispute a classification may apply to have it changed. The application is classified before it is read.