Skip to content
arghiv

> Epistemics > Credentialism > arghXiv:2506.00742

Timing and Relevance of Credential Disclosure in Asymmetric Exchanges

J. Redfern

Abstract: We coded 903 exchanges for the point at which a participant first disclosed a professional credential. Disclosure occurred at a median of 14 messages, and in 82 per cent of cases the credential was in a field unrelated to the matter under dispute. Relevance had no measurable effect on the disclosure's persuasive weight. Neither condition produced one that could be measured at all. A refusal grounded in the asker's standing is a negatio ad hominem, and one grounded in the question being too elementary to answer an infra dignitatem; both as arghXiv:2512.11487 defines them. The disclosure recorded here precedes one or the other in 197 of the 903 exchanges.

Comments:
11 pages, 3 tables. Response types: /help/response-types.
Subjects:
Credentialism (epist.CRED) (primary class); Social Discourse (disc.SOC); Moves and Tactics (argu.MOV)
Cite as:
arghXiv:2506.00742v1 (BibTeX)
Submission history:
From: J. Redfern [view email]
[v1] Mon, 30 Jun 2025
[v2] Wed, 14 Jan 2026