Skip to content
arghiv

> Metatheory > Method and Instrumentation > arghXiv:2603.02419

An Operational Criterion for Dispute Termination: Development and Reliability of an Assessment Schedule

Q. Barratt, E. Cavill

View PDF: An Operational Criterion for Dispute Termination: Development and Reliability of an Assessment Schedule

Abstract: Work on dispute termination has proceeded without an agreed criterion for the event it measures. We report the development of a fourteen-item Termination Assessment Schedule and its calibration against 260 two-party disputes rated by four coders. The behavioural and channel-state items performed acceptably (κ = 0.84 and 0.79). One item, which asks each participant to record which party prevailed, did not: across the 130 dyads in which both participants responded, no pair of responses was mutually compatible, and the item's agreement statistic is negative (κ = −0.06). Three revisions of the wording did not improve it. We treat this as a defect in the item rather than a property of the sample, remove it from scoring, and recommend that termination be defined on observable message behaviour alone.

Comments:
3 pages, 2 tables. Item 7 is retained in the schedule, unscored.
Subjects:
Method and Instrumentation (meta.METH) (primary class); Non-terminating Dispute (argu.LOOP); Outcome and Concession (argu.OUT); General Futility (futil.GEN)
TDC classes:
2.03; 2.08; 5.11
Cite as:
arghXiv:2603.02419v1 (BibTeX)
Submission history:
From: Q. Barratt [view email]
[v1] Tue, 03 Mar 2026 (102 KB)