Skip to content
arghiv

> Metatheory > Method and Instrumentation > arghXiv:2606.12903

Inter-Coder Agreement on the Twenty-Four-Hour Criterion

M. Crozier

Abstract: A criterion that requires a judgement will be applied differently by different coders, and the disagreement enters the result. The criterion of arghXiv:2604.11238 requires no judgement: it requires a clock. Six coders, three of them with no training in discourse analysis, applied it independently to the same 400 disputes. Agreement on whether a dispute had terminated was κ = 0.98, and the four disagreements all concerned exchanges in which a message had been edited after posting. The corresponding figure for the schedules in current use is κ = 0.24 on the assignment of a non-answering category. We do not suggest that those schedules are poorly constructed. We suggest that a criterion which an untrained coder can apply to a timestamp is to be preferred to one which cannot, and we again recommend its general adoption.

Comments:
6 pages, 1 table. Prepared in response to the agreement figures reported in arghXiv:2512.11487.
Subjects:
Method and Instrumentation (meta.METH) (primary class); Outcome and Concession (argu.OUT)
TDC classes:
2.03; 3.04
Cite as:
arghXiv:2606.12903v1 (BibTeX)
Submission history:
From: M. Crozier [view email]
[v1] Wed, 24 Jun 2026